Oral Presentation International Celiac Disease Symposium 2026

Gluten tolerance in non-adherent coeliac patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. (146145)

Nicoletta NN Nandi 1 , Giovanni GA Aldinio 2 , Mohamed MGS Shiha 3 , David S DSS Sanders 1 , Michael MS Schuman 4 , Lorenzo LN Norsa 5 , Annalisa AS Schiepatti 6 , Lucia LS Scaramella 7 , Matilde MT Topa 2 , Agostino Cosenza 2 , Flavio FC Caprioli 2 , Luca LE Elli 2
  1. Academic Unit of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
  2. Università Degli Studi La Statale di Milano / IRCCS Ca' Granda Policlinico Maggiore di Milano, Milan, ITALY, Italy
  3. Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals of Leicester, , Leicester, United Kingdom
  4. Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Medizinische Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Infektiologie und Rheumatologie, Berlin, Germany
  5. Pediatric Department, Vittore Buzzi Children’s Hospital, Milan, Italy
  6. Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Therapeutics, University of Pavia, Italy; Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Gastroenterology Unit of Pavia Institute, Pavia, Italy
  7. Fondazione IRCCS Ca Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milano, Center for Prevention and Diagnosis of Celiac Disease, Milano, Italy

Background & Aims: Coeliac disease (CD) is the most common immune-mediated enteropathy, and a lifelong gluten-free diet (GFD) remains the only accepted treatment. However, adherence to a strict GFD is highly variable, and many patients report occasional gluten ingestion without evidence of disease activity. Whether a subset of patients can develop gluten tolerance remains controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of gluten tolerance among patients with CD and documented gluten exposure.

Methods: MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched through March 2025 for studies assessing GFD adherence and follow-up duodenal histology. Gluten exposure was defined by self-reported dietary transgressions and/or positive gluten immunogenic peptide (GIP) testing. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients without villous atrophy (Marsh 0–2) despite documented gluten exposure. Pooled proportions were calculated using a random-effects model.

Results: Seventeen studies comprising 735 patients with CD and documented gluten exposure were included. The pooled prevalence of patients meeting criteria for gluten tolerance was 38% (95% CI, 26%–50%). Histological reassessment was performed at least one year after diagnosis, with follow-up ranging from 12 months to 20 years. Subgroup analyses according to age and method of gluten exposure assessment showed no significant differences.

Conclusions: More than one-third of patients with documented gluten exposure did not exhibit villous atrophy at follow-up, supporting the existence of a gluten-tolerant phenotype in a subgroup of patients with CD. These findings suggest heterogeneity in mucosal responsiveness to gluten and warrant prospective studies to define the mechanisms, predictors, and clinical implications of gluten tolerance.